Application Public presentation

The first application mental testing didn't deliver promising results. When running our Excel 2013 workload, the Pentium N3700 was 18% slower than the J2900 while the Celeron N3150 was 7% slower than the J1800.

The PowerPoint 2013 results are even worse. Hera the Pentium N3700 was 24% slower than the J2900, while the Celeron N3150 trailed the J1800 by a 15% margin.

The Pentium N3700 was 9% slower than the J2900 when measure performance with 7-slide fastener and the Celeron N3150 was 9% slower than the J1800.

When testing with Mozilla Kraken, the Pentium N3700 was 5% slower than the J2900 spell the Celeron N3150 was 11% slower than the J1800.

The WinRAR improved-in benchmark sawing machine the Pentium N3700 trail the J2900 by an 18% margin, piece the Celeron N3150 was 28% behind the J1800.

For an integrated political program the Pentium J2900 impressed us despite taking 76.3 seconds. Having hoped the Braswell SoCs would improve along this time, we were foiled to encounte the N3700 taking 93.3 seconds, a time that was slower than the Athlon 5150.

Meantime, flush the most patient users would give in upwards on the Celeron N3150 As it took 200 seconds, worlds slower than AMD's most low-cost APUs.

Interestingly, at that place was no more performance difference between the Braswell and Colored Trail-D SoCs in the InDesign CC screen.

Over again we see that the Braswell SoCs are a step backwards, this time when testing with After Effects CC. The Pentium N3700 was 10% slower than the J2900, while the N3150 was 11% slower than the J1800.

When testing with Illustrator CC, the Pentium N3700 was 10% slower than the J2900 and the Celeron N3150 was 11% slower than the J1800.